Procureur Marie-Line Voirol Revaz

Submitted by admin on Fri, 06/09/2017 - 07:58

Procureur Marie-Line Voirol Revaz

My partner was terrified that by my speaking out and naming this Valais prosecutor here on my website, she will be treated unfairly in the upcoming case.

Dear Arrogant Swiss: that would be collective punishment, perversion of the course of justice and downright illegal.

My partner is a witness to an alleged aggrevated assault and robbery that occurred on 27 December 2014. She was summoned to give written testimony, along with two other witnesses.

On April 28 2015 I was falsely accused of, and arrested for murder. Suddenly, the police flipped on her and started accusing her of lying. Despite there being the two aforementioned other witnesses.

As she was my alibi for the spurious murder charge, pressuring her to retract her witness testimony would be extremely damaging to her credibility. It may well have been ground enough to re-arrest me. They never had any proof what-so-ever in the first place, and they did attempt to torture a confession to murder when in fact a depressed friend with tens years history of mental illness took an overdose of prescription medication and hung himself in my flat.

During several interviews at the police station, whilst summoned regarding the case "Aymon vs Schollenberger" the police, specifically Inspecteur Sylvain Maret attempted to question her about my case, my whereabouts, and why I wasn't answering my telephone.

They attempted to detain her, whilst Inspector Fabien Fontannaz was called, who wanted to return my clothing seized at the time of my arrest, without the correct paperwork.

I wrote to my lawyer, to tell the police for at least the third time "everything goes through my lawyer".

Police detain and question my partner about my case after summoning her on another matter

Of course, my lawyer Maitre Philippe Loretan really works for the police, so the important fact that the police were harassing my partner was left out of his letter, and hence out of the investigative dossier. He says in his letter "the police contacted her" but they summoned her on an unrelated matter, and once she was there interrogated her in the police station about my case without a lawyer present. After being told many times to cease and desist.

My final lawyer Maitre Pierre Bayenet determined this to be a key element proving harassment, and he added it back in some months later.

Here is Maitre Philippe Loretan's email :

Loretan omits fact police harassing my partner, only refers to me, dishonest

So, Prosecutor Marie-Line Voirol Revaz allowed police under her command to overlap "Aymon vs Schollenberger" with my murder case, and harass my partner, after they had been repeatedly warned to back off. I might also add, 23 May 2015 they had said my murder charge was all a big mistake and they would "soon drop the charges and Inspecteur Fabien Fontannaz would be severely reprimanded".

Of course in Switzerland they threaten your children if you dare to even raise your voice. The next thing we knew Maitre Aymon, accused of aggrevated assault and robbery, whom my partner was summoned as a witness against, was reporting us to child protection, not once but three times, beginning 17 September. Somebody internal leaked him the file so each time child protection decided the case was "low priority", Maitre Aymon was informed and wrote another letter saying batshit crazy stuff like "Take that child away while she is still breathing". It is clear there was a leak due to the content of his letters.

On top of all that, around this time we received another summons to appear at the police station. The accused was now suing for defamation. Problem was, it arrived on a Saturday, was dated 7 days earlier, and the appearance was less than 48 hours away on a Monday, leaving us no time to notify our lawyer, much less bring him, or even change the date.

In the end the Swiss summoned my partner back all the way from Australia to tell her they were not interested in prosecuting Maitre Aymon, the man accused of violent robbery, and pressured her to reach a settlement with him. She had no choice Swiss justice is corrupt and they were protecting a violent criminal.

So how does a state call someone as a witness, then allow, and probably aide, the accused to attack the state witness and their children?

When its a messed up totalitarian fascist state like Switzerland.

That, my dear reader is Swiss justice.

You evil Swiss animals, I hope your children die slow painful deaths from terminal diseases and you get to watch, helpless.

I'll be having popcorn.